Back to case studies

Public Discourse & Trust Modeling

Merck

Modeled how themes, events, reach, and timing shaped public sentiment and Trust in a complex media environment.

Challenge

A global healthcare company needed a data-driven view of how media themes, events, and public discourse influenced vaccine sentiment. The goal was to identify communication watchouts, Trust-building opportunities, and moments where proactive storytelling could shape the narrative.

Approach

Used predictive AI and statistical modeling to evaluate how selected topics and events influenced discourse over time. The model separated baseline sentiment from topic-driven swings and measured Trust-driving and distrust-driving mentions separately before calculating net discourse impact.

Impact

The work showed that media volume alone did not explain impact. Reach, timing, topic alignment, and sentiment dynamics mattered. Confidence-oriented conversations reached four times as many people, while negative sentiment tended to peak up to five days after positive sentiment. That timing created an opportunity for more proactive narrative planning.

Selected slides

A closer look at the work

Healthcare discourse slide explaining why reach and timing matter more than media volume alone.
Healthcare discourse slide showing opposing sentiment reactions after major media events.
Healthcare discourse slide showing Trust-building coverage reaching four times more people than distrust.
Healthcare discourse slide comparing news topics that polarize against those that consistently build Trust.
Healthcare discourse slide mapping positive and negative sentiment against earned news and social reach.

Want the deeper story?

Let's talk through the work.